Valeriya Strakhova vs Carolina Meligeni Alves Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performance on second serves, Alves shows a slight edge, securing 37.95% of points compared to Strakhova's 35.71%. This measurement is significant when forecasting match outcomes. Moreover, despite this close margin in serving stats, the return game provides a different narrative.

Strakhova appears marginally superior in return games, winning 54.09% of her opponent's second serve points, surpassing Alves's 51.56%. On the first serve returns, Strakhova also leads slightly with 39.7% to Alves’s 36.58%. Such statistics are influential when gauging the likely dominant player in their head-to-head matchups.

Shifting focus to pressure situations, Strakhova maintains a narrow lead with a breakpoint saving rate of 44.76% compared to Alves's 43.27%. Yet, Alves has demonstrated a higher breakpoint conversion rate, claiming 37.35% of her opportunities, while Strakhova converted 46.91% of hers. These figures can serve as guidance for live in-game betting, where pressure scenarios frequently determine outcomes.

Assessing match wins over the past year, Alves presents a more impressive record, clinching 65.06% of her matches with a 54/29 win-loss ratio. In contrast, Strakhova has secured only 44.78% of her encounters, noting a 30/37 record. This general performance overview suggests a competence imbalance, favoring Alves as the match winner.

Regarding surface strengths, Alves is particularly adept on clay, where she boasts a 60% win percentage. Strakhova's preference aligns with hard courts, achieving a win rate of 58%. This factor may influence outcomes depending on the playing surface of the current event.

When evaluating head-to-head matchups, Strakhova holds a slight advantage, winning 3 out of their 5 encounters. However, these victories were secured in various conditions, which could render them less predictive in a different setting. In scenarios requiring extreme pressure resilience, Alves has excelled in tiebreaks, winning 1 out of 1 against Strakhova.

Examining the quality of opposition, Alves has participated against players with an average rank of 436.72, whereas Strakhova’s opponents averaged 363.64. This disparity may suggest a difference in relative match difficulty with implications for future contests.

In the realm of deciding set performance, Alves shows superiority, capturing 58% of her deciding sets over the past year in contrast to Strakhova’s 52%. Such statistics can inform predictions for matches expected to reach intense, conclusive phases.

Given the comprehensive analysis of various stats, such as serving, breakpoints, historical head-to-head performance, and surface-specific abilities, Alves emerges as the likely victor of the upcoming match.